quite different studies of nestbox preferences by bluebirds:
Dave Hofer, of East Concord has compared standard (NABS) and Peterson boxes for
five years. He has kept detailed records and banding data, including 15
recaptures in the last three years. One of those was five years old.
The Peterson boxes proved twice as successful as the NABS box. This past
year, he paired Peterson boxes with five Gilwood boxes and eight PVC boxes.
One of the Gilwood boxes was used twice by bluebirds. Tree swallows did
use all five of the Gilwood boxes and all eight of the PVC boxes.
"In general our year was definitely two different seasons: April and May were not good at all; June and July were great. Tree swallows had a terrible year this season... it wasn't just the bad weather. I think we had far fewer [tree swallows] in our area this year."
yery condensed below, is from eight pages of detailed records sent to Dave
L. Berner,(1) of New York University, Cobleskill, presented some of
his personal research at the recent North American Bluebird Society (NABS) Board
meeting in Minneapolis: In my research through 1999, my most successful boxes to
date had been NABS boxes with oval [Peterson] holes. This summer, I paired
NABS oval-hole boxes with both Gilwood and Troyer boxes. (2) The NABS
oval boxes paired with Troyer boxes had twice as many bluebird attempts as the
Troyer box. Tree swallows used nearly equal number of each style.
When Gilwood boxes were paired with NABS oval-hole boxes, the Gilwood boxes had
more than six times the bluebird use than the NABS boxes. Swallows used
the NABS boxes at a higher rate than Gilwood, probably because bluebirds
occupied most of the Gilwood boxes.
Kevin Berner, NABS Research Chairman, will be one of our speakers at our April
Posted with permission from the February 2001 Bluebird Recovery Program Newsletter "BLUEBIRD NEWS"